The government is sticking to the organic target, even though it has not gone “particularly well.”

Økologisk Nu

Since 2021, it has been a political objective to double the size of the organic sector by 2030. Since then, the area under organic cultivation and the number of organic farms have declined. We are therefore now further from the approximately 21 percent organic share—the target for the area in just over three years—than we were five years ago. Christian Rabjerg Madsen, Minister for Nature and Animal Welfare (Social Democrats), calls it a “very ambitious” target, but he still believes it can be achieved. “It is true that this is not a development that has gone particularly well in recent years, but it is an ambition that we [the government, ed.] are sticking to—and an ambition that I am very confident we will achieve,” he said on Wednesday, when he took part in a dialogue meeting in Kolding organised by the Organic Denmark association. The reason for his optimism lies in the major transformation of agriculture that is under way—both in terms of the forthcoming nitrogen regulation, the national ban on pesticides in vulnerable groundwater areas, and the green tripartite agreement. All of these are political agreements that Christian Rabjerg Madsen expects will have the knock-on effect of encouraging more farmers to convert to organic production. “When we impose strict requirements on nitrogen, we create regulation in the fields that makes it more attractive to farm organically. When we impose requirements concerning pesticides, it becomes more attractive to farm organically. So we will see a positive side effect from some of the ambitions we have for our country, which will push more people towards organic production, and that is enormously positive,” he argued. He believes that the expansion of organic production is important because he regards it as a “Swiss Army knife” capable of solving several of the problems currently facing agriculture and the environment. “When it comes to animal welfare, you are part of the solution. When I look at challenges relating to our environment, whether that concerns biodiversity or nitrogen, you are part of the solution. When we talk about drinking water without pesticide residues, you are part of the solution. There is no reason to reinvent the wheel. It is better to reach into the cupboard for some of the wheels that are already there, and you are the answer,” he told the approximately 80 attendees who filled the room at the Scandic Hotel. **Criticism of the budget proposal** However, the ambitions are difficult to discern in the government’s recently presented budget proposal. According to the organic sector, it is not enough to get more people to convert to organic production—it is equally important to increase the consumption and export of organic products. Nevertheless, the Organic Cuisine Label, which is intended to increase the use of organic products in professional kitchens, has only been allocated funding to continue for one year, even though the sector has long called for a more permanent solution. Other items in the budget proposal have been cut, and no funding has been set aside for an export-promotion initiative—even though organic exports are part of the doubling target. Most recently, the supporting parties Red–Green Alliance and The Alternative criticised the proposal’s planned savings of just over DKK 45 million. The parties believe that the cuts conflict with the target of doubling organic production. Looking back over the past several years, there has, with a few exceptions, been a nearly identical pattern of disappointment over the budget: Organic production rarely receives new funding, and the multi-year grants, which are not adjusted for inflation, become worth less and less. “It is true that there has been a slight reduction, but it is a reduction from a relatively high baseline if you look at it over the years. This is not the only source of funding for achieving a target. Significant research funds have also been allocated,” the minister told *Økologisk Nu* after the dialogue meeting. “What makes me more optimistic about whether we will achieve our targets is that we are currently embarking on regulation concerning both nitrogen and drinking water which—if we do this correctly—will provide a huge incentive for increasing the area under organic cultivation. So we need to look at the entire range of measures when discussing organic production, conversion and incentives,” he added. But there is also a need for greater focus on sales and market promotion—there is something missing here, isn’t there? “I agree that market promotion is an important element, and it is also something we need to look at when we address both the food strategy [to be drawn up next year, ed.] and the four-party agreement on pigs. We must ensure that consumers and the sales and distribution sector are brought on board.”

Since 2021, it has been a political objective that organic farming should be twice as large by 2030.

Since then, the organic area and the number of farms have declined. We are therefore now further from the approximately 21 per cent organic farming that is the area target in just over three years than we were five years ago.

Christian Rabjerg Madsen, Minister for Nature and Animal Welfare (S), calls it a "very ambitious" objective, but he still believes in it.

"It is, of course, not a development that has gone particularly well in recent years, but it is an ambition that we (the government, ed.) are sticking to - and an ambition that I am very confident that we will achieve," he said when he took part in a dialogue meeting in Kolding on Wednesday organised by the Danish Organic Association.

The reason for his optimism is to be found in the major transformation of agriculture that is under way - both with regard to the forthcoming nitrogen regulation, the national pesticide ban on vulnerable groundwater areas and the green tripartite agreement.

All political agreements that Christian Rabjerg Madsen expects will have the knock-on effect of encouraging more people to convert to organic farming.

"In other words, when we impose strict requirements on nitrogen, we get regulation out in the fields that makes it more attractive to be organic. When we impose requirements concerning pesticides, it becomes more attractive to be organic. So we are going to get a positive side effect from some of the ambitions we have for our country, which will push more people in the direction of organic farming, and that is enormously positive," he argued.

He believes that the spread of organic farming is important because he considers it a "Swiss army knife" that can solve several of the problems facing agriculture and the environment today.

"When it comes to animal welfare, you are part of the solution. When I look at challenges relating to our environment, which can involve biodiversity as well as nitrogen, you are part of the solution. When we talk about drinking water without pesticide residues, you are part of the solution. There is no reason to reinvent the wheel. It is better to reach into the cupboard for some of the wheels that are already there, and you are the answer," he said to the approximately 80 attendees who filled the room at the Scandic Hotel.

Criticism of the Finance Bill proposal

However, the ambitions are difficult to spot in the government's recent Finance Bill proposal. According to the organic industry, it is not enough to get more people to convert to organic farming - it is just as important to increase the consumption and export of organic products.

Nevertheless, the Organic Cuisine Label, which is intended to increase the use of organic products in professional kitchens, has only been granted funding to continue for one year, even though the industry has long called for a more permanent solution. Other items in the Finance Bill proposal have been cut, and no funds have been allocated for an export-promoting initiative - even though the export of organic products is part of the doubling target.

Most recently, the supporting parties, the Red-Green Alliance and The Alternative, have criticised the proposal's planned savings of just over DKK 45 million. The parties believe that the savings conflict with the doubling target for organic farming.

Looking back over the past few years, with a few exceptions, there has been an almost identical picture of disappointment over the Finance Bill: Organic farming rarely receives new funding, and the multi-year allocations, which are not adjusted for inflation, become worth less and less due to inflation.

"It is true that there is a slight decline, but it is a decline from a relatively high base level, if you look at it over the years. Of course, it is not the only source for achieving a target. Significant research funds have also been set aside," the minister said after the dialogue meeting to Organic Now.

"What makes me more optimistic about whether we will achieve our objectives is that we are currently tackling regulation both in relation to nitrogen and drinking water, which - if we do this correctly - constitutes a huge incentive to increase the organic area. So you have to focus on the whole palette when talking about organic farming, conversion and incentives," he added.

But there is also a need for more focus on sales and market promotion - something is missing here, isn't it?

"I agree that market promotion is an important element, and it is also something we need to look at when we tackle both the food strategy (to be drawn up next year, ed.) and the pig four-party agreement. Then we need to make sure that consumers and the sales chain are included."